Best Quantitative Trading Firms

The Power Players of Quantitative Trading: A Deep Dive into the Top Firms. The hedge fund industry controls about $3.26 trillion, with quantitative trading funds commanding a significant $500 billion slice. While most hedge funds track global market trends, a few standout quant funds consistently outperform, challenging the efficient market hypothesis. Discover the top quantitative trading firms driving innovation and delivering superior returns

Renaissance Technologies vs Two Sigma vs D. E. Shaw

In investment services and managed funds, no single company outperforms in every area. Instead, a few firms are exceptionally consistent, each catering to different investor needs—hence no monopoly in this market space.

This article reviews the three most successful quantitative trading firms: Renaissance Technologies – Medallion Funds and Institutional Equities Funds, Two Sigma, and D.E. Shaw – Composite Fund. Before diving into the details, here’s an overview of their approach and trading performance.

Renaissance Technologies – Top Quantitative Investment Firms

Company Background Renaissance Technologies was founded in 1982 by Jim Simons. This early start in quantitative trading is a testament to Simons’ mathematical innovation. The Medallion Fund, their most profitable portfolio, launched in 1988, building on Leonard Baum’s mathematical models. The fund trades shorter-dated, automated decision-making systems.

Renaissance Technologies is known as one of the top quantitative investment firms and operates on an invite-only basis, primarily including employees—mostly data scientists and mathematicians, with around 90 holding PhDs. Their trading strategy remains one of Wall Street’s best-kept secrets.

renaissance technologies review
Pictured: Middle right - the founder of Renaissance Technologies Jim Simons

Renaissance Technologies Performance The Renaissance Technologies Medallion Fund has grown 24% year-to-date as of mid-April 2020, achieving a 9.9% gain in March despite the largest day point drop in history. The Medallion Fund boasts a 66% gross annualized return from 1988 to 2018. In contrast, other Renaissance funds like Diversified Alpha have underperformed, down nearly 20% through June 2020.

Renaissance Technologies Strategy While details are scarce, the Medallion Fund is known for short-term holdings across global equities, commodities, currencies, and futures, with significant leverage and high turnover. The fund likely employs a vast array of signals, including unconventional ones like weather patterns.

Renaissance Technologies Market Presence Renaissance Technologies, managing $110 billion in assets as of 2019, is the second-largest hedge fund firm globally. The Medallion Fund is revered as the gold standard in quantitative trading, influencing market patterns through its transactions.

Renaissance Technologies Fees The Medallion Fund charges some of the industry’s highest fees: 5% of assets and 44% of profits since 2002, justified by its impeccable performance over three decades.

Two Sigma – Best Quant Funds

Company Background Two Sigma is known as one of the best quant funds worldwide was founded in 2001 by Mark Pickard, David Siegel, and John Overdeck. Inspired by D.E. Shaw and Renaissance Technologies, Two Sigma built its foundation as a technology company, employing data scientists over MBAs and focusing on infrastructure from the outset.

The Two Sigma website captures this philosophy: “We follow principles of technology and innovation as much as principles of investment management.”

Two Sigma Market Presence Two Sigma manages over $60 billion in assets with a workforce of over 1,500 employees, growing rapidly from $8 billion in 2011 to $32 billion in 2015.

Two Sigma Strategy Two Sigma operates various funds with different strategies. The Compass Fund trades futures across multiple markets, while the Spectrum Fund is an equity portfolio. Known for crowdsourcing techniques, they hold competitions to discover new trading signals.

Two Sigma Performance Two Sigma has achieved impressive returns, such as a 57.55% net return in 2014 from their Enhanced Compass Fund and a 25.56% return from the Compass Fund. In 2016, the Compass Fund gained 10.35%, and the Spectrum Fund delivered a 3% return.

Two Sigma Fees Two Sigma generally follows a Two Twenty fee structure: a 2% management fee and a 20% performance fee, which is cheaper than Renaissance Technologies’ Medallion Fund but still relatively high.

Quant Savvy vs Major Indexes %

Quant Savvy vs Major Indexes %

Outperform Major Hedge Funds using Quant Savvy Systems

Our edge? We execute small, strategic trades that let us swiftly enter and exit the market, unlike big funds that struggle with billion-dollar positions.

Precision day trading—quick in, quick out, capitalizing on market shifts while others lag behind.


Discover the Numbers That Hedge Funds Don’t Want You to See!

D.E. Shaw

Company Background David E. Shaw founded the company in 1988. Shaw, has a net worth of $7.3 billion and is considered the “King Quant” by Forbes after exploiting market inefficiencies with high-speed computer networks. Notably, a young Jeff Bezos worked there while developing Amazon.

D.E. Shaw Market Presence D.E. Shaw, ranked the 21st largest hedge fund in 2011, managed $50 billion in assets by 2019, with continued growth in 2020.

D.E. Shaw Strategy D.E. Shaw employs complex quant trading and has expanded into non-systematic and traditional strategies like distressed debt. In 2020, they raised $2 billion in commitments for the D.E. Shaw Composite Fund, a $13 billion flagship.

D.E. Shaw Performance Institutional Investor reported that D.E. Shaw delivered the 5th highest returns among hedge funds globally. As of 2019, it was the fourth highest-grossing hedge fund company, returning over $29 billion to investors since 1988. The Composite Fund has had an annualized net return of 10.8% since 2011.

D.E. Shaw Fees D.E. Shaw initially charged a 3% management fee and a 30% performance fee, lowered post-2008 crisis to 2.5% and 25%. In 2019, they reverted to the 3-and-30 pricing model, still cheaper than Renaissance Technologies’ Medallion Fund.

Which Quantitative Trading Funds Come Out on Top?

These three are the best quantitative trading firms are among the highest returning funds globally, making quantitative trading increasingly popular. Traditional firms like Barclays are shifting to algorithmic strategies.

All three firms are exceptional, but RenTech’s Medallion Fund stands out despite the exclusivity and secrecy. Two Sigma offers competitive performance with a more open approach, and D.E. Shaw is a consistent performer with diversified strategies.

Even flagship funds face challenges during market turmoil. The Medallion Fund’s 9.9% return in March 2020 proves its resilience. Understanding which company fits your needs is crucial as quant trading gains popularity.

Quant Savvy has been offering quantitative trading solutions since 2014. Our algorithmic trading systems generate monthly income with low risk. We aim to offer peace of mind and help you secure your financial future. Contact us now to learn more.

Social

swing trading strategies and tactics

Swing Trading Strategy

In this blog post we will introduce you to the swing trading itself, swing strategies and techniques without hyperbolizing potential...

algorithmic trading best quant trading firms

Best Quantitative Trading Firms

The hedge fund industry today stands at around $3.26 trillion, of which quantitative trading funds make up around half a...

Achieve Financial Freedom with Smart Algorithms

Grow your wealth with advanced trading technology while staying in control


Maximize Returns

Advanced algorithms
Significant growth
Consistent returns

Effortless Trading

Automated systems
24/7 access
Monitor anytime

Full Control

Manage funds
Add, withdraw, pause
Clear reports

Security & Support

Secure capital
Under control
Expert advice

**Commodity Future and Trading Commission Futures has large potential rewards, but also large potential risk. You must be aware of the risks and be willing to accept them in order to invest in the futures markets. Do not trade with money you cannot afford to lose. The past performance posted on quantsavvy.com is not necessarily indicative of future results. Quant Savvy provides trading algorithms based on a computerized system. All advice is impersonal and not tailored to any specific individual’s unique situation. Quant Savvy, and its principles, are not required to register with the NFA as a CTA and are publicly claiming this exemption. Information posted online or distributed through email has NOT been reviewed by any government agencies — this includes but is not limited to back-tested reports, statements and any other marketing materials. Carefully consider this prior to purchasing our algorithms. For more information on the exemption we are claiming, please visit the NFA website: http://www.nfa.futures.org/nfa-registration/cta/index.html. If you are in need of professional advice unique to your situation, please consult with a licensed broker/CTA. **DISCLAIMER: Commodity Futures Trading Commission Futures trading has large potential rewards, but also large potential risk. You must be aware of the risks and be willing to accept them in order to invest in the futures markets. Don’t trade with money you can’t afford to lose. This is neither a solicitation nor an offer to Buy/Sell futures. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those discussed on this website or on any reports. 

The past performance of any trading system or methodology is not necessarily indicative of future results. ***All returns posted on this site and in our videos is considered Backtested Trading Performance. Backtested trading results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. In fact, there are frequently sharp differences between backtested trading results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of backtested trading results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, backtested trading does not involve financial risk, and no backtested trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk in actual trading. For example, the ability to withstand losses or adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of backtested performance results and all of which can adversely affect actual trading results. 

CFTC RULE 4.41 – Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not been executed, the results may have under — or over — compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity. Simulated trading programs in general are also subject to the fact that they are designed with the benefit of hindsight. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profit or losses similar to those shown. Statements posted from our actual customers trading the algorithms (algos) include slippage and commission. Statements posted are not fully audited or verified and should be considered as customer testimonials. Individual results do vary. They are real statements from real people trading our algorithms on auto-pilot and as far as we know, do NOT include any discretionary trades. Tradelists posted on this site also include slippage and commission. All advice and/or suggestions given in Quant Savvy website are intended for running automated software in simulation mode only. Trading futures is not for everyone and does carry a high level of risk. All past performance shown is backtested data only.